Stockport Council News

Stockport Council News

Anwar Majothi is a liar.

Anwar MajothiPosted by Sheila Oliver Sun, August 02, 2015 17:11:24

Mr Parnell never withdrew his consent for me to act on his behalf. Majothi is not a fit person to hold public office

Sent: 29 March 2012 21:22
To: Anwar Majothi
Cc: MICHAEL PARNELL; e-mail iwwall; DAVID PENKETHMAN; Steve Houston
Subject: Re: Your Stage 2 complaint

Dear Mr Majothi

This is a ridiculous situation. If I were to make an official complaint against you - and I have very, very good cause to do that - then would you also deal with the complaint against yourself? Well, this is Stockport Council so you might!

I might submit a complaint against you to see how that gets dealt with, unless you come to your senses regarding this one. Obviously, if you spent years and years pussyfooting around not dealing with a simple, cheap-to-solve complaint about the statutory duty to provide counselling from troubled children adopted from Stockport Council resulting in multiple imprisonments of an innocent man at a cost to the taxpayer of probably hundreds of thousands of pounds, then I don't have much confidence in your ability to do anything either compentently or honestly.

All this is going up on websites, Mr Majothi.

Pass this complaint to someone competent to deal with and also someone uninvolved with the abuses that have been perpetrated against a completely innocent man.

I look forward to hearing from you. It was stated publicly that Steve Houston deals with complaints against the Monitoring Officer. Tell him to get off his bottom and do just that.

Sheila

----- Original Message -----

From: Anwar Majothi

To: 'sheilaoliver@ntlworld.com'

Cc: Adrian Moores

Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 3:06 PM

Subject: Re: Your Stage 2 complaint

Dear Ms Oliver,

Thank you for your email. I have discussed this matter with my line manager, Mr Adrian Moores, whom I have copied into this email. Mr Moores agrees with me that the investigation of Stage 2 complaints is solely assigned to me and it would therefore be inappropriate for the complaint to be passed to someone else to investigate.

In light of this, you can either give me the go head to investigate your complaint at Stage 2 or you can escalate your complaint to the LGO (although I have already advised you that it is unlikely that the LGO will investigate your complaint at this stage).

Please let me know how you wish to proceed.

Yours sincerely,

Anwar Majothi

Corporate Complaints Manager

Stopford House

Stockport Council

SK1 3XE

Tel: 0161 474 3182

Fax: 0161 474 4006

http://www.stockport.gov.uk

From: Sheila Oliver [mailto:sheilaoliver@ntlworld.com]
Sent: 27 March 2012 18:28
To: Anwar Majothi
Cc: MICHAEL PARNELL; Steve Houston; Leader; Eamonn Boylan
Subject: Re: Mr Parnell

Dear Mr Majothi

I have absolutely no confidence that you will investigate this complaint in a proper fashion. Over the many, many years this has been going on you could have solved the problem of Mr Parnell by providing the statutory help that he was entitled to for his troubled daughters adopted from Stockport Council and you could have done this at minimal cost possibly five years ago.

It would be ludicrous for you to investigate this complaint. A complete whitewash.

I look forward to hearing the response from someone senior to deal with this matter. This case is being taken to the Inspectorate for the CPS, who are again today highly critical in the press of the prosecutions they are bringing. Mr Parnell's prosecutions didn't even meet the CPS's own basic, legally binding guidelines for prosecuting a case.

All responses from the Council will be posted up in the public domain and forwarded to the very many enemies of the LibDems. Rupert Murdoch seems to be cleaning up politics now (it is a funny old World), and I can contact him directly via Twitter about what is going on here. I think the Council needs to make sure all its actions stand up to close scrutiny, because Mr Murdoch is hell bent on revenge on dodgy Coalition politicians. Just think of the human rights the Council has abused in this case, not only of Mr Parnell but his daughters and wife. The Council has a track record of driving vulnerable people to suicide. You should have helped him - that is your job. The LibDems believe in human rights; they are against waste of public money. Well, this must have cost me as a taxpayer hundreds of thousands of pounds and I am jolly annoyed about it. Just think how this case would look splashed everywhere highlighting their double standards. Rupert Murdoch would love this one.

Yours

Mrs Oliver

PS I have told you why I am unhappy with the Stage 1 complaint. Here we go again around in never ending circles, just as we did with what I correctly stated was the school on a dangerous toxic waste dump.

----- Original Message -----

From: Anwar Majothi

To: 'sheilaoliver@ntlworld.com'

Cc: Steve Houston ; Info Services

Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:42 AM

Subject: FW: Mr Parnell

Dear Ms Oliver,

I write to confirm that your email below (and your email of 22nd March) have been brought to my attention. I note that you have requested that Mr Houston investigates your complaint further at Stage 2. I should inform you that this would be inappropriate given that I am specifically tasked with investigating complaints at Stage 2 of the corporate complaints procedure. Mr Houston has already investigated and responded to your complaint at Stage 1.

If you still wish to proceed with your complaint I would be grateful if you would let me know why you remain unhappy following the Stage 1 response? I look forward to receiving your comments within the next 10 days. I will then investigate your complaint and aim to provide you with an outcome within 20 working days.

Alternatively, if you do not wish for me to investigate your complaint you can escalate your complaint to the Local Government Ombudsman (LGO); however it is unlikely that they will investigate as your complaint has not been exhausted locally. The contact details for the LGO are as follows:

Local Government Ombudsman

PO Box 4771

Coventry

CV4 0EH

Telephone: 0845 602 1983

Text: 0762 4804323

Email: advice@lgo.org.uk

Yours sincerely,

Anwar Majothi

Corporate Complaints Manager

Stopford House

Stockport Council

SK1 3XE

Tel: 0161 474 3182

Fax: 0161 474 4006

http://www.stockport.gov.uk

From: Sheila Oliver [mailto:sheilaoliver@ntlworld.com]
Sent: 26 March 2012 20:27
To: Steve Houston
Cc: Anwar Majothi; MICHAEL PARNELL; Eamonn Boylan; Leader
Subject: Mr Parnell

Dear Mr Houston

Regarding the letter sent by you on 8th March 2012, I can't request Mr Majothi carries out the stage 2 complaint process because he is up to his neck in this case. He should have realised the Council had a statutory duty to help Mr Parnell and got off his bottom and done something. He didn't - year after year after year. He is a massive part of the problem. You will have to deal with the Stage 2 complaint.

I have heard nothing back from Mr Parnell, so the letter of authority stands until you send me written confirmation that he doesn't want me to act for him or I hear further from him. I am happy not to act on his behalf as I have a lot on my plate, but I wonder if the two council officers you mention are the same ones who threatened to kill him, kick his f*cking head in and ram his phone so far up his backside he would be sh*tting phone parts for a week, or, indeed, the ones who attacked him. Or, I wonder if they are officers who knew all this was happening (I sent you the video evidence) and did nothing about it. I hope you don't mind if I don't take the word of anyone at Stockport Council. Documentary evidence is needed before I stand down.

I am taking the matter to the Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate, who have recently been very critical of the CPS. I didn't know they existed. Mr Parnell's case should never have been taken by them to court as they failed to prove the five statutory tests they need to establish before taking a case forward, and they took a huge number of cases forward against him.

So, no whitewashes please. Just do your job and do it properly and every step of the way I shall keep interested parties informed of your responses.

Just some points from your letter which need raising:-

1) "this letter has addressed the issues raised under Stage 1 of the Council's corporate complaints procedure." No, it hasn't!

2) "I have decided not to uphold your complaint". This is not surprising but nevertheless disappointing. You were, of course, always likely to support Mr Khan.

3) "It would be inappropriate for the Council to investigate the complaints you have raised on behalf of Mr. Parnell.....he subsequently spoke to two Council Officers to retract the consent."

This comment is unacceptable. It is vital to know who these supposed council officers are? Please detail their names and the circumstances of this alleged encounter.

4) "As you no longer have authority to act on behalf of Mr Parnell, the Council is not obliged to investigate the issues you have raised on his behalf." I do have authority unless you prove otherwise.

I have experience of the Council's complaints system which is innavigable. I raised with Mr. Majothi the fact that the school which I correctly stated had a £5 million black hole in its funding, was to be put on unremediated toxic waste. I got nowhere with Mr. Majothi and I think you will realise that I am no quitter. He is impossible to deal with. There are entire websites devoted to the sheer incompetence of our Local Ombudsman and as they employ former senior council officers, their impartiality is in doubt.

5) I have repeatedly raised this matter with the former Chief Executive, the Leader, the Current Chief Executive, Khan, Webb and all the Executive Councillors. I have the email evidence. To say I have not raised this matter before is an untrue statement and I wonder why you should claim that despite a large amount of documentary evidence to the contrary. I have been branded vexatious for contacting the Council repeatedly. If the Council stopped sending innocent council taxpayers to prison and failing to investigate their valid complaints, there would need to be less contact.

6) "Mr Parnell should have complained about these issues sooner". Mr Parnell tried and tried and tried, as can be confirmed by the local reporter. He was repeatedly arrested for trying to enter council buildings. I have had to plead with the police not to arrest him for trying to leave a council meeting early. You forget there is masses of documentary police and court evidence. Please do not insult my intelligence by making such ludicrous statements which are ill-befitting to a senior and highly paid Council officer.

Your letter is full of shoulds and mays and inappropriates and when you say it is difficult to investigate Mr Khan you mean you really don't want to.

Please proceed with this complaint and do so in an honest and professional matter, bearing in mind the close scrutiny to which your replies and indeed the whole complaint process at Stockport Council will be put.

Yours

Sheila



  • Comments(0)//blogging.sheilaoliver.org/#post1684

Did Schulz listen? Did he Buxton.

Anwar MajothiPosted by Sheila Oliver Thu, January 15, 2015 08:58:10


Paid £145,000 plus top of the range BMW plus £5k which he couldn't remember what it was for (could you forget £5k of your salary?) Well rid of him, I say.

  • Comments(0)//blogging.sheilaoliver.org/#post1200

Alice through the Broken Glass

Anwar MajothiPosted by Sheila Oliver Sun, December 15, 2013 08:38:18
This elderly lady was brought home early from her daycare centre by Stockport Council funded community transport. It is alleged that there was an important football match on that day and that the driver wanted to drop her off before the agreed time.

When there was no-one home at the arranged time, although the carer was almost home unbeknownst to the driver, he smashed a glass panel to gain entry and left a vulnerable lady in her 90s and who suffered from dementia alone in the midst of all this broken glass.

Mark Hunter as MP and Council Leader refused to take any action against the driver. So much for safeguarding vulnerable adults at Stockport Council, and as with Mr Parnell and the corruption with Vale View School Project, it is impossible to complain against Stockport Council no matter how hard you try.

  • Comments(0)//blogging.sheilaoliver.org/#post672