Stockport Council News

Stockport Council News

Mr Parnell's own words about the ludicrous assault with a sneeze charge

Town Hall ProtesterPosted by Sheila Oliver Sun, August 23, 2015 19:40:03

The corrupt Stockport LibDems knew there had been no assault with a sneeze. They had the CCTV of the incident which they refused to allow at the trial of Mr Parnell RIP:-

Crown Court Appeal

Manchester Crown Court

Minshull Street


Appeal against conviction contrary to

Section 39 Criminal Justice Act 1988

Common assault by sneezing

Innocent by plea as to the allegation

Case appealed in the interest of justice

As to being disputed in not proved beyond reasonable doubt to all submitted evidence


contrary to

Section 39 Criminal Justice Act 1988

Common assault by sneezing

10th July 2009

Stockport Magistrates Court

Edward Street


I Michael Stewart Parnell appeal the decision made against me to the allegation of common assault by sneezing with intention to spread a cold to another

As contrary to section 39 criminal Justice Act 1988

The reason for this Appeal is in the interest of Justice and to preserve that right and for the Justice system not to be abused by those that divert the course of fair justice

In this appeal I will show that an injustice has been done either by or toward myself from others with their intent to harm

My main reason of this Appeal is

I am innocent of all allegations made against me and I will stay true to Justice and uphold the Queens peace with honour

I pride myself that I respect the law and will stay strong to that and not commit any offences against any person

How do I intend to show I am innocent

well firstly I give my word

I Michael Stewart Parnell

Do solemnly swear that I tell the truth to my oath towards myself that I will always be truly honest in that which I say and do

I Michael Stewart Parnell have not sneezed on or towards any person and have not in any way intentionally or recklessly sneezed or blown my nose on any person to cause them any harm alarm concerns or distress

I have always conducted myself in ways that respects all people politely and with dignity I am courteous towards all other peoples needs and if I can will always help out and I receive gratification from their thanks as my rewards people respect me for what I do this is what I valve as a good quality

I pride myself of being of good character that is approved by others and my life has been served to that of helping others which I do enjoy and get my rewards by doing

Why are allegations made against me

I believe there are those whose own wrongdoing puts them to accountability and their diversions are in their attempts the ways to discredit the way in which I pursue dealing with those issues

Many people and also police officers have commented that I have conducted myself exemplary and I am the most peaceful protester they have ever come across and they complement me on how I behave

The issues with the other parties are statutory in duty and in their failings not to deal with those issues they have resorted to criminal acts in their attempts to divert the courts from their true purpose as to enforce the laws and regulations in the UK

False allegations only serve one purpose they damage hurt those they are directed towards to discredit our freedom of rights

In this appeal what are the false allegation disputed and by who were they fabricated and how do I prove they acted maliciously

The allegation of the sneeze with the intension to spread a cold that which was brought about after the failing that previous allegations failed to have me moved away on that day because I was not committing any crime allegations must be fabricated if the one making the allegations knows of a crime before it is apparent and suggests thats what will happen before it does

Allegation of a sneeze was made by the two security guards now known to me as Mr Francis Craughwell

Mr Stephen Duggan

The false allegations are made to the police by that which is now written in the security guards witness statements and also the MP3 and video recordings that have been gathered to support the detection and prosecution of crime

How can I say that the allegations made are false

The sneeze or the exhaling under force down what is alleged to be my right nostril did not and could or would have happened by me, if those making these allegations could imagine this would happen from me then in their minds they are capable of fabricating such an allegation because the possible outcome might be to serve their satisfaction to discredit my cause and get rid of me once and for all, and is as stated by the security guards to something that they are working towards

The security guards disrespect for the law and their comments on tape stating that should be brought before court as their bad character along with their other unlawfulness and many attacks on my person under the pretence that they can get away with it only because they are part of the big organisation and the one individual cant take on those who have millions behind them

  • Comments(0)//